Sorry for replying so late. I have just checked in some bug fixes for
fssync (r72206).
This was indeed not much work.
Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't think a whole lot is needed to make fssync a reality:
>
>1. Cure any bitrot that has set in. It would also ne nice to replace
>exi
2007/1/24, Uwe Oestermeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Perhaps the maintenance can be made easier if we can change the code
without deprecation warnings. Nobody seems to have used fssync in the last
two years.
I think you can take that granted. fssync has been pretty useless so far.
--
Best regards,
On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Uwe Oestermeier wrote:
Sorry for replying so late. I have just checked in some bug fixes for
fssync (r72206).
No apologies needed. Thanks for picking this up!
This was indeed not much work.
Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think a whole lot is nee
Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 at 16:48 Uhr +0100
wrote:
>
>Maybe, but I like your idea of using utilities below. My original
>thinking was
>along these lines: fssync should strive to serialize "all" object
>data. (Note that it isn't always obvious what data is in
Hot on the heels of my multi-adapter problem:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-January/021600.html
...which I'm still waiting for guidance on, I now find that queryAdapter
and calling an interface behave unexpectedly differently in the case
where an object directly implements an i
Chris Withers wrote:
Hot on the heels of my multi-adapter problem:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-January/021600.html
...which I'm still waiting for guidance on, I now find that queryAdapter
and calling an interface behave unexpectedly differently in the case
where an object di
Laurence Rowe wrote:
From the Interface.__call__ docstring: "If an object already implements
the interface, then it will be returned"
queryAdapter is looking in the adapter registry.
You have not registered any adapters.
So this looks like the expected behaviour to me.
Documented maybe, ex
On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Laurence Rowe wrote:
From the Interface.__call__ docstring: "If an object already
implements the interface, then it will be returned"
queryAdapter is looking in the adapter registry.
You have not registered any adapters.
So this looks like t
On 1/24/07, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
queryAdapter, for me, is "starting with the supplied object, get me
something that implements the supplied interface and return None if no
such object can be obtained".
o = IFoo(ob, None)
if os is not None:
...
If there's another funct
Jim Fulton wrote:
If there's another function which does this, fine, if not, then I
maintain the current behaviour is not correct...
Chris, documented behavior is not incorrect just because you expect
otherwise.
Indeed, sorry, that's not what I meant, although I can see it came
across like
Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/24/07, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
queryAdapter, for me, is "starting with the supplied object, get me
something that implements the supplied interface and return None if no
such object can be obtained".
o = IFoo(ob, None)
if os is not None:
Ah, now that
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 05:46:48PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I might even hack the TextWidget so I could just do:
>
>factory=".TextWidget"
>permission="zope.Public"
>/>
+1
> I'd be happy to deprecate the view directive.
+1
Caveats: won't it seem strange to newcomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Fred Drake wrote:
>> On 1/24/07, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> queryAdapter, for me, is "starting with the supplied object, get me
>>> something that implements the supplied interface and return None if no
>>> such
13 matches
Mail list logo
