Hi Godefroid
One of the questions we are exploring is : "which workflow engine should
we use/expand on ?"
Draw the workflows as UML state diagrams if at all possible. Go with
DCWorkflow as far as it takes you.
Then fix ArchGenXML to generate code or GS XML for the next workflow
engine you'd li
Hey,
Just to point out another workflow engine that hasn't been named yet:
hurry.workflow.
It's explicitly unambitious and it's pure Zope 3. Those may be things
that are either good or bad, depending on your project.
http://codespeak.net/svn/z3/hurry.workflow/trunk/
It has been used in the
Hi Godefroid,
CCing zope3-users, where this post belongs to.
On Monday 12 March 2007 11:48, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> - about the existing workflows (DCWorkflow, Zope3.wfmc, AlphaFlow,
> OpenFlow...)
Kit asked the question about workflows on the SchoolTool list as well; I
assume that you guys
On Monday 12 March 2007 18:24, Daniel Nouri wrote:
> I'd go for zope.wfmc. zope.wfmc is arguably the best choice if you want to
> model with JaWE / XPDL.
Yes, this cannot be understated. The best thing about zope.wfmc is JaWE. The
fun thing about it is that you generate the basic workflwo and yo
Platform dependent distributions are *not* portable. They can depend
on system settings, such as Python Unicode size and library
locations. This can cause major annoyance and breakage when people
automatically download these with easy_install or zc.buildout.
The only platform we should d
Jim Fulton wrote:
Platform dependent distributions are *not* portable. They can depend on
system settings, such as Python Unicode size and library locations.
This can cause major annoyance and breakage when people automatically
download these with easy_install or zc.buildout.
Yeah, the uni
On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Platform dependent distributions are *not* portable. They can
depend on system settings, such as Python Unicode size and library
locations. This can cause major annoyance and breakage when
people automatically downloa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Peterson wrote:
> I am trying to get Zope3 page templates installed as a standalone
> package. I thought this would be easy and maybe I am missing something,
> but, I am having no luck at all.
>
> I have seen several posts regarding doing this,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeff Peterson wrote:
>> I am trying to get Zope3 page templates installed as a standalone
>> package. I thought this would be easy and maybe I am missing something,
>> but, I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, I have pagetemplates running standalone (thanks to everyone who
chimed in with help) and I can use them in nearly every aspect I expect
of them, except, macros don't expand for editing. Now, this isn't a
show stopper, but it does certainly change
On 3/5/07, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great. I've added you to http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/SummerOfCode2007. If
you happen to have any project suggestions, feel free to add them to the
list.
Not a project suggestion, but relevant nonetheless: an excellent GSoC
mentoring
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 15:49, Jeff Peterson wrote:
> Ok, I have pagetemplates running standalone (thanks to everyone who
> chimed in with help) and I can use them in nearly every aspect I expect
> of them, except, macros don't expand for editing. Now, this isn't a
> show stopper, but it does cer
Hi,
I'd like to change ZPTPage editform and make content_type field editable.
(content_type is defined in IRenderZPTPage)
Because sometimes zptpage's content_type value is inappropriate,
for example, when I change object name from "foo.html" to "foo.xml", etc.
I'd appreciate any suggestions.
Th
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 3/5/07, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great. I've added you to http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/SummerOfCode2007. If
you happen to have any project suggestions, feel free to add them to the
list.
Not a project suggestion, but relevant nonetheless:
Hello Godefroid,
I'm having a bit biased view, because I know just zope.wfmc and have
the luck developing a pure Z3 application.
I think with zope.wfmc you have
- WFMC/XPDL support, you can shine with standards and big companies
love standards
- because it's XPDL support there's a graphical proce
15 matches
Mail list logo