Shane Hathaway wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
+1
Big +1 to all of Philipp's suggestions.
context
I have a fair amount of experience with Zope2 and am learning Zope3...but
with half an eye at Ruby on Rails and Spring/Hibernate. I
That's a fair question.
context
This is a pattern I have learned by using Docbook 5.0, which is another
one of those
_lets_rewrite_an_established_technology_to_address_longstanding_issues_
releases.
Norm uses the RelaxNG annotations namespace[1].
I like the design principle RelaxNG uses for
I remember that Jim once presented two XML samples and asked which one
was more readable. I preferred many elements over many attributes. He
preferred the opposite. I thought he was crazy, and as I recall, he
thought I was crazy, too. :-)
Elements vs Attributes is an age old debate. Some
On Thursday 09 February 2006 13:40, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Any thoughts or gut reactions?
Gut reaction: Very cool.
As long as we can easily also have the traditional way I would love to see
a
prototype in a branch.
Regards,
Stephan
+1
I want the best of all worlds, ZODB, RDBMS, ORM,
