On 10/27/05, Julien Anguenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We did think hard on browser issues (especially IE ones) avoiding to
> require the XML processing header for PT XML processing using a new 'IE
> problem aware' sniffer that detects a PT as an XML document with
> different approaches. I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> with October winding down, the freeze on the trunk is coming quickly.
>>> So, if you have any outstanding work, now is the time to get it done.
>>> During the last week I have monitored the proposals and branches a
>>> bit and I t
Julien Anguenot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
with October winding down, the freeze on the trunk is coming quickly. So, if
you have any outstanding work, now is the time to get it done. During the
last week I have monitored the proposals and branc
On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:33, Julien Anguenot wrote:
> Is it ok for everybody ?
Yep, since another core developer was involved in the proposal, this is fine.
I assume Jim had something to say about this already too.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
> with October winding down, the freeze on the trunk is coming quickly. So, if
> you have any outstanding work, now is the time to get it done. During the
> last week I have monitored the proposals and branches a bit and I thin
Hi everyone,
with October winding down, the freeze on the trunk is coming quickly. So, if
you have any outstanding work, now is the time to get it done. During the
last week I have monitored the proposals and branches a bit and I think most
people are done with their work.
After Michael told
