On Wednesday 01 March 2006 08:07, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Maybe, although I feel that the interface-based schemas was a mistake
> anyway. It would probably be better to focus energy on making XForms
> based schemas, both persistent and not.
Sure, if someone wants to do that. Not me though. There
On 3/1/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this help with implementing persistent schemas at all?
Maybe, although I feel that the interface-based schemas was a mistake
anyway. It would probably be better to focus energy on making XForms
based schemas, both persistent and not.
Just
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 04:02, Chris Withers wrote:
> Does this help with implementing persistent schemas at all?
Yes, maybe, Jim? It also helps me with the WebDev stuff.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software De
Hi All,
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:17, Jim Fulton wrote:
Log message for revision 65611:
Made implementation specifications picklable.
Yipee!
Does this help with implementing persistent schemas at all?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope &
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 16:52, Dieter Maurer wrote:
For new projects, you should investigate the new options.
Product development will get much simpler with Zope3 technology
(and its schemas and views). Currently, there is no T
Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 April 2005 16:52, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > For new projects, you should investigate the new options.
> > Product development will get much simpler with Zope3 technology
> > (and its schemas and views). Currently, there is no TTW
> > ("Th
