On Monday 12 March 2007 18:24, Daniel Nouri wrote:
> I'd go for zope.wfmc. zope.wfmc is arguably the best choice if you want to
> model with JaWE / XPDL.
Yes, this cannot be understated. The best thing about zope.wfmc is JaWE. The
fun thing about it is that you generate the basic workflwo and yo
Hey,
Just to point out another workflow engine that hasn't been named yet:
hurry.workflow.
It's explicitly unambitious and it's pure Zope 3. Those may be things
that are either good or bad, depending on your project.
http://codespeak.net/svn/z3/hurry.workflow/trunk/
It has been used in the
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> One of the questions we are exploring is : "which workflow engine should
> we use/expand on ?"
I'd go for zope.wfmc. zope.wfmc is arguably the best choice if you want to
model with JaWE / XPDL.
This is a nice intro to zope.wfmc:
http://source.schooltool.org/svn/trunk/
Godefroid Chapelle schrieb:
[..]
In order to help us make a proposal, we would be very interested to hear
your comments both
- about the existing workflows (DCWorkflow, Zope3.wfmc, AlphaFlow,
OpenFlow...)
- or about the directions that you would suggest in order to help you
use a given engine