On 19 Jul 2007, at 20:12 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 19 Jul 2007, at 00:43 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 18, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Up until now we've been a bit sloppy when it came to egg
dependencies. Not s
On Jul 19, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 19 Jul 2007, at 00:43 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 18, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Up until now we've been a bit sloppy when it came to egg
dependencies. Not specifying a version number or range basically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2007, at 00:43 , Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Depending on specific versions in library packages (as opposed to
>> application packages or buildouts) is a recipe for disaster IMO.
>> As soon as 2 packages dep
On 19 Jul 2007, at 00:43 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 18, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Up until now we've been a bit sloppy when it came to egg
dependencies. Not specifying a version number or range basically
means that the code in question assumes it will work with any
