Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-07 Thread Martijn Faassen
Gary Poster wrote: [snip a few things that we think would be nice and useful for the packages] Sure. I'd love to. I'm happy if I at least get the stuff open- sourced, though. Life is full of compromises. I understand the spirit in which these were donated to the community, and it's

Zope Foundation Imminence (was Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages)

2006-02-07 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 6, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: BTW, how impending is impending? Days, weeks, months? Anybody know? The word on the street is a pretty small number of weeks. (I believe the general idea at ZC is to not announce any precise guess as to exactly how impending we think

Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-06 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday 06 February 2006 06:13, Martijn Faassen wrote: Is this stuff intended to end up in the zope core eventually? If so, what steps will need to be taken? I imagine this also ties into the eggs story, but the question on the zope core perhaps still stands - what would be a dependency of

Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-06 Thread Benji York
Stephan Richter wrote: On Monday 06 February 2006 06:13, Martijn Faassen wrote: Is this stuff intended to end up in the zope core eventually? If so, what steps will need to be taken? In the coming weeks I am going to be involved in this sort of discussion hopefully on this and the plone-dev

Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-06 Thread Martijn Faassen
Chris McDonough wrote: BTW, how impending is impending? Days, weeks, months? Anybody know? On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Benji York wrote: My first thought is to consider how the impending charter of the Zope Foundation influences things. Good question. My response to this would be two

Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-06 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday 06 February 2006 09:57, Martijn Faassen wrote: Chris McDonough wrote: BTW, how impending is impending?  Days, weeks, months?  Anybody know? On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Benji York wrote: My first thought is to consider how the impending charter of the  Zope Foundation

Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-06 Thread Gary Poster
(apologies to Martijn and Stephan for repeating this email: zope.org rejected my previous emails) On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: On Monday 06 February 2006 06:13, Martijn Faassen wrote: Is this stuff intended to end up in the zope core

Re: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-06 Thread Gary Poster
(Apologies to Martijn for the dupe; again, zope.org rejected my previous mail) On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Gary Poster wrote: [snip lots of cool stuff] Great, more stuff to play with! :) Just saw zope.file; this begs to be combined with hurry.file's smart upload

RE: [Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-06 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Gary [...] If desired. Pretty sure that zope.locking, zope.file (once blob support is in), and zope.mimetype ought to go in the core. we have a zope.html that we'll get out soonish too (based in some TIKS integration of FCKeditor--thanks Roger!) that we expect to be in the