On 9/26/07, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That said, I'd still like the process *without*
> the tool comprehensible by normal human beings.
Agreed; I was trying to usurp the goal of having a reasonable process.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"Chaos is the score upon which rea
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-9-26 16:19 +0200:
> ...
>* That you should never ever delete a release, even if it's a
> "brown bag" release.
But, if you know it is severely broken and you do not have
a working replacement, you should remove it as soon as possible
-- to avoid more people
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 17:18 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
> I definitely think we should work out a human procedure *first*.
>
> But some tools to assist the human in doing repetitive, failure-prone
> work (releasing versions of many eggs) would definitely be appreciated
> by me.
>
> Perhaps
On 9/26/07, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reducing overhead is why I proposed an automated tool.
Exactly. I like this approach myself.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller
__
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:19:45PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
> [snip]
>> Doing another checkout of the tag will create a significant overhead to
>> the release process of a package.
>
> I'd like to highlight this. We need to be careful we don't increase release
> over
On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
Doing another checkout of the tag will create a significant
overhead to the release process of a package.
I'd like to highlight this. We need to be careful we don't increase
release overhead too much, other
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 10:19, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > I, for one, promise to read it every time I make a release until I've
> > memorized it.
>
> It would be good if everybody could use it (as least the section on how
> to make releases) as a step-by-step procedure every time.
