On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:20, Fred Drake wrote:
Stephan is arguing for finer-grained configurations, which is likely to
be better for reuse, at the cost of *reduced* convenience.
Yes, and that's fine for me. What I consider an issue is that
changing the semantics of
include
On May 23, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I don't know what is blocking a 3.4 release. AFAIK, eggification is on
the roadmap for 3.5, right? So we should be focused on stabilizing
the
last zpkg build, while still allowing the eggified / broken-out
project model to move forward.
