On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:20, Fred Drake wrote:
> > Stephan is arguing for finer-grained configurations, which is likely to
> > be better for reuse, at the cost of *reduced* convenience.
> Yes, and that's fine for me. What I consider an issue is that
> changing the semantics of
> <include package="zope.foo.package"/>
> is a change to the package's public interface.
This is not public interface in that sense. For zope.app.zcmlfiles included
packages, zope.app.zcmlfiles represents the public interface and for packages
using SETUP.cfg, ns.packagename-configure.zcml is the public API.
Both of these do not change.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list