On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:20, Fred Drake wrote: > > Stephan is arguing for finer-grained configurations, which is likely to > > be better for reuse, at the cost of *reduced* convenience. > > Yes, and that's fine for me. What I consider an issue is that > changing the semantics of > > <include package="zope.foo.package"/> > > is a change to the package's public interface.
This is not public interface in that sense. For zope.app.zcmlfiles included packages, zope.app.zcmlfiles represents the public interface and for packages using SETUP.cfg, ns.packagename-configure.zcml is the public API. Both of these do not change. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com