On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:20, Fred Drake wrote:
> > Stephan is arguing for finer-grained configurations, which is likely to
> > be better for reuse, at the cost of *reduced* convenience.
> Yes, and that's fine for me.  What I consider an issue is that
> changing the semantics of
>     <include package="zope.foo.package"/>
> is a change to the package's public interface.

This is not public interface in that sense. For zope.app.zcmlfiles included 
packages, zope.app.zcmlfiles represents the public interface and for packages 
using SETUP.cfg, ns.packagename-configure.zcml is the public API.

Both of these do not change.

Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to