Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Listen, we were over this.
Apparently, some of us are not ;-)
(and the problems caused by having two repositories for the same piece
of software keep emerging!)
I wrote whole proposal about this months ago
already [1] and it was disputed heavily.
Right, but from what I remember, this was mainly from the Zope 3 crowd,
who need beating with a reality stick every so often ;-)
doesn't want to go this way. I can tell you we'll have a hard time with
the Zope 5 vision already (which I think is the most sensible one at
this point).
What I'd like to see:
- common code base
- zope 3 server/publisher/etc components
- zope 2 server/publisher/etc components
Of course, it'd be great to if they were all interchangeable.
Now, if all of zope 3 existing in lib/python/zope (in Zope 2 world) what
problems would there by for Zope 3 purists other than a bit of a loss of
disk space?
Also, put differently, what makes using "pure zope 3" compelling over
"using zope 3 components in Zope 2"?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com