Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process. Philipp, would you mind separating the release process into
a separate file? Or do you mind if I do it?
Some comments on the current draft at:
http://svn.zope.org/*checkout*/Sandbox/philikon/fou
On Oct 3, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
For example, a packaging of MochiKit 1.3.1 might have a version #
like 1.3.1-1, or, if it is exciting enough: 1.3.1-1.1
I assume setuptools interprets version numbers like this in a
reasonable way.
AFAIK. :)
Jim
--
Jim
Jim Fulton wrote:
For example, a packaging of
MochiKit 1.3.1 might have a version # like 1.3.1-1, or, if it is
exciting enough: 1.3.1-1.1
I assume setuptools interprets version numbers like this in a reasonable
way.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
__
On Oct 3, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process.
+1
There are other improvements that might be made, but let's not
let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
This isn't perfect, so I get to sugg
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process.
+1
There are other improvements that might be made, but let's not let
the perfect be the enemy of the good.
This isn't perfect, so I get to suggest it.
I propose that we codify the practice of r
