[Zope3-Users] [Fwd: Re: View or content provider]

2007-07-22 Thread Daniel Nouri
] To: Daniel Nouri [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wednesday 18 July 2007 07:35, Daniel Nouri wrote: You make it sound like the more objects you adapt, the more flexible you are. Which is true to a certain extent, but at the same time, the more

[Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-18 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hi Stephan! Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 17 July 2007 14:28, Daniel Nouri wrote: plone.portlets introduces some two dozen (!) interfaces/concepts on top of viewlets in order to implement the flexibility that it needs. E.g. it introduces an 'available' method/property that controls

[Zope3-Users] Re: AW: Re: AW: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hi! Roger Ineichen wrote: I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname is also traversable as a real view and will probably show up in google. How would it show up in Google? Google bots don't try arbitrary URLs, they

[Zope3-Users] Re: AW: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hi! Stephan Richter wrote: On Monday 16 July 2007 19:32, Daniel Nouri wrote: I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname is also traversable as a real view and will probably show up in google. How would it show up in Google

[Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: Am Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007 14:08 schrieb Stephan Richter: On Monday 16 July 2007 19:32, Daniel Nouri wrote: I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname is also traversable as a real view

[Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hi Roger! Roger Ineichen wrote: If you like a explicit pattern, then calling views in ZPT is fine. On the other hand, if you use a viewlet manager, the manager can implement conditions and show based on rules e.g. session state or login status more or less viewlets. I think best reason to

[Zope3-Users] Re: Formlib and action conditions

2007-06-20 Thread Daniel Nouri
Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 20 June 2007 13:55, Daniel Nouri wrote: Isn't it reasonable to expect an action to execute although it's not visible when the form is rendered again? Nope. For me the condition is a condition of availability and not visibility. That's exactly where I

[Zope3-Users] Formlib and action conditions

2007-03-14 Thread Daniel Nouri
Currently, when you have a condition on an action, and it is satisfied on render time, you'll get a button. However, if you click that button and the condition happens to be false in the subsequent request, the action will not be executed, with no error message or notice. Is this intended?

[Zope3-Users] Re: Skinning in Zope 3.3

2006-05-11 Thread Daniel Nouri
Achim Domma wrote: Hi, I try to understand how to customize the look feel of my page using the new skin/layer implementation of version 3.3. I followed the example on http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/SimplifySkinning but still don't understand on how to

[Zope3-Users] IField in Object(Field): RequiredMissing

2006-03-13 Thread Daniel Nouri
not behaving as it should? -- Daniel Nouri [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users