Hi garz
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>
>
> hi roger,
>
> thanks again. :) sry for writing so much nonsense and dont
> getting my point clearly described. didnt want to waste your
> time and i try to improve on that.
>
>
> Rog
hi roger,
thanks again. :) sry for writing so much nonsense and dont getting my point
clearly described. didnt want to waste your time and i try to improve on
that.
Roger Ineichen wrote:
> Fields are a fundamental part of
> our concept and are the component which allows you to define
> things
Hi garz
Sorry I don't have to much time for answer all your questions
very well but let me give some hints.
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>
>
> hey roger,
>
> thank you for your answers. really appreciated. :)
>
> @hook: i und
hey roger,
thank you for your answers. really appreciated. :)
@hook: i understand now, the applyChanges-method isnt a hook, its just a
function so that the apply-thing can be used alone too. a hook is, as far as
i understood this concept, a point of extensibility or variation. both isnt
possible
Hi garz
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>
>
> hey roger,
>
> how does this pdf-thing look like? when the form is rendered,
> is there called an adapter for IPageTemplate? or the question
> differently posed, do you use the original forms
hey roger,
how does this pdf-thing look like? when the form is rendered, is there
called an adapter for IPageTemplate? or the question differently posed, do
you use the original forms render-method? and how does the form respectivly
the fieldwidgets-manager knows that it is now supposed to render
Am Mittwoch 08 Oktober 2008 17:14:35 schrieb Tim Cook:
> (Thanks Roger and Adam for your earlier replies.)
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:59 +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> > Moreover, z3c.form is complex, but it isn't hard if one knows what to
> > do/how to do - which leads me back to my WIKI id
Am Donnerstag 09 Oktober 2008 04:24:25 schrieb garz:
> thx for your replies! now i have new stuff to think about. :)
>
>
> Can you give an example what you can't do with z3c.form?
> i think z3c.form is in respect of what can be done with it general enough.
> i can realize what i want to do with it
thx for your replies! now i have new stuff to think about. :)
Can you give an example what you can't do with z3c.form?
i think z3c.form is in respect of what can be done with it general enough. i
can realize what i want to do with it plus i know how to do it. it isnt that
i dont understand z3c.
(Thanks Roger and Adam for your earlier replies.)
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:59 +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> Moreover, z3c.form is complex, but it isn't hard if one knows what to do/how
> to do - which leads me back to my WIKI idea...
Hermann,
This is a very good point. For those of us
Am Mittwoch 08 Oktober 2008 16:28:07 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> Hi Hermann
>
> > Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>
> [...]
> > So, I think two solutions to that could be:
> >
> > - Improve the documentation (however, I'm unsure in
Hi Hermann
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
[...]
> I think I'm not the only one here, I read quite often about
> similar problems in this list here, so this is my resumee:
>
> - z3c.form is complex
> - It's not obvious how to imp
Hi Tim
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:32 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
> > >
> > > What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
> >
> > The ObjectWidget is a widget for an IObject field
Hello Tim,
Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:52:20 PM, you wrote:
TC> I am assuming, though haven't tried, that I can specify an interface
TC> that is maybe 3,4 or more steps through Object attributes and have the
TC> correct widget (text, textline, etc.) render?
It should, but actually those 3,4 l
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:32 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
> >
> > What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
>
> The ObjectWidget is a widget for an IObject field.
> This field is used for attributes which provide a own
> schema and hold a refenece to a pyton instance
> providing this sc
Hey Roger,
Yes, you're right, thanks for the explanation.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:32:04 PM, you wrote:
RI> Hi Tim, Adam
>> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 06:25 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
>>
&
Hi Tim, Adam
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 06:25 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
>
> > Adam Groszer is working on a ObjectWidget implementation.
>
> What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
The ObjectW
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 06:25 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
> Adam Groszer is working on a ObjectWidget implementation.
What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
Thanks,
Tim
--
Timothy Cook, MSc
Health Informatics Research & Development Services
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.co
Am Mittwoch 08 Oktober 2008 01:11:24 schrieb garz:
> hey,
>
> while using z3c.form-package i reach its limits here and there. thats why i
> started to think about how a more general implemention should look like. my
> intention of writing this is that i want to know what you are thinking
> about it
garz wrote:
> hey,
>
> while using z3c.form-package i reach its limits here and there. thats why i
> started to think about how a more general implemention should look like.
A *more* general z3c.form sounds like a frightening prospect. :-)
Martin
--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`,
Hi Garz
> Betreff: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
>
>
> hey,
>
> while using z3c.form-package i reach its limits here and
> there. thats why i started to think about how a more general
> implemention should look like. my intention of writing this
>
hey,
while using z3c.form-package i reach its limits here and there. thats why i
started to think about how a more general implemention should look like. my
intention of writing this is that i want to know what you are thinking about
it and i want to know the design-decisions that led to the diff
22 matches
Mail list logo
