Re: [Zope3-Users] z3c.traverser and stackinfo
2009/10/21 Simon Elbaz simon.el...@free.fr:
I am trying to use stackinfo module from z3c.traverser and don't
understand the following error because ITraversalStackInfo should adapt
BrowserRequest class according to
(http://svn.zope.org/z3c.traverser/trunk/src/z3c/traverser/stackinfo/consumer.py?rev=95983view=auto):
TypeError: ('Could not adapt', zope.publisher.browser.BrowserRequest
instance
URL=http://localhost:9060/++skin++Adama/mysite/@@stackinfo.html,
InterfaceClass z3c.traverser.stackinfo.interfaces.ITraversalStackInfo)
Did you not include z3c.traverser.stackinfo configure.zcml file?
--
WBR, Dan Korostelev
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] zope.app.container importing problem
2009/9/14 wsh shuha...@gmail.com Hi, all When I'm testing a package, some code is broken and I get the error message AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'interfaces'. After I checked the code I found that there are some code in the __init__.py like following: from zope.app import container When it try to reference the interfaces attribute of the container module, but the attribute does not exist. I checked the container with print dir(container) and get following: ['__builtins__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__name__', '__path__'] But if I add following line in the __init__.py this problem can be solved. from zope.app import container import zope.app.container.constraints print dir(container) ['__builtins__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__name__', '__path__', 'constraints', 'i18n', 'interfaces'] Can anyone explain this? That's because zope.app.container.interfaces module is not imported, so zope.app.container doesn't have interfaces attribute. But it seems to be imported by constraints module, so it magically appears as interfaces in zope.app.container. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] test writing with z3c.testsetup
2009/3/17 Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu: On Tuesday 17 March 2009, Simon Elbaz wrote: It is maybe the download list http://download.zope.org/distribution/ that is not up to date. We should just remove this directory. Is there still anything useful there? I use PILwoTk from there, however, I add the url to the package directly as a find-link. It would be cool if the original PIL package download worked out of box. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] problem adding localsitemanager in a subscriber with 3.5dev KGS
2009/2/28 Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com: changing the assignment in zope.site.site.changeSiteConfigurationAfterMove (line 254) to site.getSiteManager().__bases__ = (next, ) if next else () should do it. Well, it should be set to global site manager instead of empty tuple, but it's basically like that :) I've fixed that in the trunk. Thanks for the report! It's in zope.site 3.6.1 now. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] problem adding localsitemanager in a subscriber with 3.5dev KGS
2009/2/27 Jens W. Klein j...@bluedynamics.com: Hi, I use the the KGS of zope 3.5dev (I need Python 2.6 because of third party code i integrate) and try to build a simple site and add a local component registry using a subscriber. It looks like I missed something - or I hit a bug in zope3.5dev. But before I report a bug I want to be sure that it isnt my fault. ...snip code and traceback... It calls the subscriber, adds the LocalSiteManager and then another event happens and the subscriber zope.site.site.changeSiteConfigurationAfterMove is called (line 251). Here is the code in there: if event.newParent is not None: next = _findNextSiteManager(site) site.getSiteManager().__bases__ next is None here, so __bases__ has a None in the list. Btw., the way the sitemanager is added is the same as described in Phillip von Weiterhausens book. Whats wrong? It assumes that the root folder has its own component registry, but the rootFolder factory doesn't create one, so it returns none as the next site manager. So, you need to call setSiteManager for the root folder after creating it. However, I guess this case should be handled by zope.site's event handler. I'll take a look at that tomorrow. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] problem adding localsitemanager in a subscriber with 3.5dev KGS
2009/2/28 Jens W. Klein j...@bluedynamics.com: Am Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:28:38 +0300 schrieb Dan Korostelev: [...] It assumes that the root folder has its own component registry, but the rootFolder factory doesn't create one, so it returns none as the next site manager. So, you need to call setSiteManager for the root folder after creating it. indeed! from site import MySite mysite = MySite() from zope.app.folder import rootFolder root = rootFolder() root.setSiteManager(LocalSiteManager(root)) root[u'mysite'] = mysite works fine! However, I guess this case should be handled by zope.site's event handler. I'll take a look at that tomorrow. changing the assignment in zope.site.site.changeSiteConfigurationAfterMove (line 254) to site.getSiteManager().__bases__ = (next, ) if next else () should do it. Well, it should be set to global site manager instead of empty tuple, but it's basically like that :) I've fixed that in the trunk. Thanks for the report! -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] TextIndexNG question...
2009/2/18 Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com: On 18.02.2009 17:14 Uhr, Thierry Florac wrote: I suppose that all this is a splitter/stopwords problem, but I can't manage to make this work correctly so any help would be greatly appreciated. Right. The splitter and query parser use different approaches for splitting words and dealing with non-characters. This is subject for a major cleanup with the next TXNG 3.3 version to appear at some time in the future :-) On the topic: Andreas, can you please review the two line patch (see link) for zopyx.textindexng3 that fixes a core dump with python 2.5 at last? It does work with python 2.4 and exactly the same patch was applied for normalizers before. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2111923group_id=50052atid=458418 -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] Run starup code with zope 3.
2009/2/12 Thierry Florac thierry.flo...@onf.fr:
Le jeudi 12 février 2009 à 17:50 +0100, Sebastian Bartos a écrit :
I'm struggling with some Zope 3 startup code. I registered a user like
this for the Session Credentials plugin and login form stuff:
...
def create(self, data):
site = getSite()
sm = site.getSiteManager()
if sm.has_key('auth'):
return Site is already set up
pau = Pluggableauth()
sm['auth'] = pau
sm.registerUtility(pau, Iauth)
users = PrincipalFolder()
sm['auth']['Users'] = users
sm.registerUtility(users, IAuthenticatorPlugin, name=Users)
pau.authenticatorPlugins = (users.__name__, )
pau.credentialsPlugins = (No Challenge if Authenticated,
Session Credentials)
user = InternalPrincipal(user, foo, user,
passwordManagerName=SHA1)
users[user] = user
principalPermissionManager.grantAllPermissionsToPrincipal(user)
To run code automatically at application startup, I think that you
should have a look at the IDatabaseOpenedWithRootEvent (defined in
zope.app.appsetup.interfaces).
I use this event to check a set of persistent database utilities at
application startup, and it works fine.
Also, zope.securitypolicy provides a way to store location-based
grants. Just adapt your site object to IPrincipalRoleManager or to
IPrincipalPermissionManager (defined in zope.security.interfaces) and
use its methods to allow/deny roles/permissions to some principal ID.
It will handle the actual storing work. Child objects will inherit
parent's settings until they have their own local settings.
--
WBR, Dan Korostelev
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] Zope security and inheritance
2009/2/7 Taurus5 tauru...@web.de: I have some trouble with the zope security. I got ForbiddenAttribute Exception on sub-classes. The checkers should be defined for each class separately. They aren't used for subclasses automatically, though you can use protectLikeUnto or require like_class=.your.Class / to define the same checkers. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] Question about menu.py
2009/2/4 Simon Elbaz elbazsim...@gmail.com: When I look to the getMenuItemType() function, it returns a utility ( return zope.component.getUtility(IMenuItemType, self.id)) and the consequence is that the adapter lookup returns nothing in getMenuItems. That's strange, because that IMenuItemType utility is the interface that the menu item adapters are registered as providing. It works as intended here in plain zope3. Can you provide some more info? -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] Users as Content
You should look at the zope.app.authentication package. It has a basic persistent principal folder and principal itself classes that can be used as is to add principals to the site. You need to add pluggable authentication to your site and register it as an IAuthentication utility, then you can add principal folder to it and then principals to that folder. 2009/1/17 Ben Mason b...@sharkbyte.co.uk: Hey all, I'm new to Zope 3 but a long time user of Zope 2. I'd like to make a content type behave like a principal so I can add users to my site as content. In Plone this is done with membrane. Anyone got any pointers in how to do this? Thanks Ben ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] Is zope3 dead?
Oh, also note, that zope3 releases actually happen and the latest one (according to SVN) is 3.4.0c7 (released on sept 2008). But they are released in form of versions.cfg file for KGS (like http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/versions-3.4.0c7.cfg) instead of tarballs. I think this is the most important thing that should be mentioned on the website. Correct me if I am wrong. :) 2008/12/21 Alek the...@poczta.onet.pl: For some time, I have a bad, worrisome feeling that Zope3 development pace has slew down. Today looked to zope wiki and discovered that there are virtually no new articles. I've also found that last release is almost one year old and zope 3.4.0c0 is not even a real release, but a release candidate. Someone would say: hey, but maybe the development has just been decentralized? Zope 3.4 is the first eggified release, so maybe the development just moved to eggs (z3c.* and others). But I digged deeper and searched for some stats of Zope3-Users traffic, thanks to google. What I found I have published on a chart at http://pmiblog.blox.pl/2008/12/Is-Zope3-Dead.html. The traffic is at least half lower in 2008 than in 2007. Maybe the traffic moved somewhere else - to Wiki? This hypothesis haven't worked: I looked to zope 3 wiki and: the last new topic is 3 months old last month there is one edit of a topic After July 2008 there was not a one month with more than 5 edits. To summarize: It seems that zope3 development and engegement have been stalled for over half a year. Any thoughts? Have I missed some switch to other communication channels? Or maybe grok really took away all hearts and souls? What are the causes of the slowdown? Or maybe I just misinterpret the symptoms? Warm Regards, Alek ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] Is zope3 dead?
No. Just the zope3 package is not released anymore. Now there's a bunch of eggs on PyPI, providing some functionality, like zope.component or zope.app.catalog. Some of core packages are mature enough, so there aren't much new releases of them, but other (like ZODB or z3c.form) are developed very actively. So Zope3 is alive and rocking :) There's certainly a problem with the website/documentation. IIRC, there was a project to redesign zope.org website to make it more friendly and informative, but people are quite busy so it looks stalled. Also, it would be great if people wrote more articles and updated current docs though, but it isn't the case currently. :-( 2008/12/21 Alek the...@poczta.onet.pl: For some time, I have a bad, worrisome feeling that Zope3 development pace has slew down. Today looked to zope wiki and discovered that there are virtually no new articles. I've also found that last release is almost one year old and zope 3.4.0c0 is not even a real release, but a release candidate. Someone would say: hey, but maybe the development has just been decentralized? Zope 3.4 is the first eggified release, so maybe the development just moved to eggs (z3c.* and others). But I digged deeper and searched for some stats of Zope3-Users traffic, thanks to google. What I found I have published on a chart at http://pmiblog.blox.pl/2008/12/Is-Zope3-Dead.html. The traffic is at least half lower in 2008 than in 2007. Maybe the traffic moved somewhere else - to Wiki? This hypothesis haven't worked: I looked to zope 3 wiki and: the last new topic is 3 months old last month there is one edit of a topic After July 2008 there was not a one month with more than 5 edits. To summarize: It seems that zope3 development and engegement have been stalled for over half a year. Any thoughts? Have I missed some switch to other communication channels? Or maybe grok really took away all hearts and souls? What are the causes of the slowdown? Or maybe I just misinterpret the symptoms? Warm Regards, Alek ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
Re: [Zope3-Users] resource-directories
That's quite hard, because resources and resource directories are registered providing simple zope.interface.Interface instead of something like IDirectoryResource. I think it's a problem that need to be fixed in zope.app.publisher. 2008/12/2 Frank Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi everyone, how can I get a list of all resourceDirectory's which are currently accessible via my zope instance? I'm interested in a name-physical_directory for all of them mapping. Thank you, Frank ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
[Zope3-Users] SimpleComponentTraverser flaw
I think that topic was raised before, but I can't find any information about what's going to be done on that :) The zope.app.publication.traversers.SimpleComponent (that's used by default for most of objects) in its publishTraverse method uses the adapter lookup without asking for some specific view interface (like IBrowserView), like this: view = queryMultiAdapter((ob, request), name=name) This causes problems when we have any non-view context/request adapters registered. One real-life example of that kind of adapter is ILayoutTemplate adapter registered with z3c:layout directive from z3c.template package. So the publisher that looks for views should look them up like this: view = queryMultiAdapter((ob, request), IBrowserView, name=name) One issue is that SimpleComponentTraverser also provides IXMLRPCPublisher and (as far as I understood) should be able to look up IXMLRPCView adapters. I'm asking about how to fix this without breaking much backward-compatibility. Should we just write split the traverser in two (one for IBrowserViews and one for IXMLRPCViews) or should we look up the view depending on request by using if/then condition (if IBrowserRequest is provided - lookup IBrowserView, if IXMLRPCRequest provided - lookup IXMLRPCView). Or probably some other way? Also, is there any things to note when fixing that issue? Thanks in advance for any comments on this. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
[Zope3-Users] Call for translating z3c.form
Hello, fellow users and developers of zope components! I just added support for i18n in z3c.form, so it can be now translated to many languages. If you want to contribute to z3c.form internationalization, checkout the z3c.form.pot file from the z3c.form's trunk and translate it to your language, then send back to me or commit to the repo, if you are a committer. Thanks! -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
[Zope3-Users] Bug in z3c.form.browser.orderedselect
Hi, people! In the OrederedSelectWidget's input template there's a little bug in options displaying. Options (for selectedItems and notSelectedItems) are displayed using expression like this (simplified): option tal:content=entry/content / Which will result in calling entry['content'] if it is callable, which is true (for example) for the standard zope's Content Types vocabulary from zope.app.content, because by default the term.value is used for the content and then, if the term provides ITitleTokenizedTerm it is replaced with translated term.title. But in the Content Types vocabulary, terms are not titled, so term.value is used, which is some Interface subclass and which is callable. So, as far as I understand, to fix little issue, we need to add the nocall modifier in the template, so option expression will look like this (simplifed): option tal:content=nocall:entry/content / Thanks! PS Is there any bug tracking system for z3c.form package (like zope's general one on launchpad)? -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
[Zope3-Users] Versions policy for KGS
Hi! I guess this question have been raised before, but I can not find any info on this. What is the process/policy of version update for the zope 3.4 KGS ( http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/). Does package maintainers should inform administrator about the update or there's some monitoring system? I am asking this, because there's some packages that needs to be updated for sure. I currently can remember just two, but I guess there's more: - zope.app.locales - newer versions contains fixes/updates for Russian (fixes some ugly mistakes), Japanese and Spanish translations for 3.4. - zc.recipe.filestorage - contains fix for blobstorage configuration problem. The version in KGS just produces wrong config snippet if you specify blob-dir option and so it's unusable. Currently, I just redefine versions for this packages in my buildout.cfg files, but I guess they should go in the KGS. Thanks in advance. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
[Zope3-Users] Catalog add menu item permission.
Hello. I wonder why catalog's (zope.app.catalog.catalog.Catalog) addMenuItem has zope.ManageContent permission when all other interactions (including simple __len__ attribute) is restricted to the zope.ManageServices permission. Is it a bug or I just don't understand something? Right now I just redefine that addMenuItem in my site configuration, but if it's a bug, I really want to see it fixed in Zope3 itself. Does anyone knows about this issue? Thanks! -- WBR, Dan Korostelev ___ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
