Am Mittwoch 08 Oktober 2008 01:11:24 schrieb garz:
hey,
while using z3c.form-package i reach its limits here and there. thats why i
started to think about how a more general implemention should look like. my
intention of writing this is that i want to know what you are thinking
about it and
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 06:25 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Adam Groszer is working on a ObjectWidget implementation.
What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
Thanks,
Tim
--
Timothy Cook, MSc
Health Informatics Research Development Services
LinkedIn
Hi Tim, Adam
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 06:25 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Adam Groszer is working on a ObjectWidget implementation.
What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
The ObjectWidget is a widget for an IObject
Hey Roger,
Yes, you're right, thanks for the explanation.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:32:04 PM, you wrote:
RI Hi Tim, Adam
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 06:25 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Adam Groszer is working on a ObjectWidget
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:32 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
The ObjectWidget is a widget for an IObject field.
This field is used for attributes which provide a own
schema and hold a refenece to a pyton instance
providing this schema.
Hello Tim,
Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 3:52:20 PM, you wrote:
TC I am assuming, though haven't tried, that I can specify an interface
TC that is maybe 3,4 or more steps through Object attributes and have the
TC correct widget (text, textline, etc.) render?
It should, but actually those 3,4
Hi Tim
Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 15:32 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
What is the proposed functionality of ObjectWidget?
The ObjectWidget is a widget for an IObject field.
This field is used for attributes which provide
Hi Hermann
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
[...]
I think I'm not the only one here, I read quite often about
similar problems in this list here, so this is my resumee:
- z3c.form is complex
- It's not obvious how to implement certain form-patterns
- People
Am Mittwoch 08 Oktober 2008 16:28:07 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
Hi Hermann
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] thoughts about z3c.form-package
[...]
So, I think two solutions to that could be:
- Improve the documentation (however, I'm unsure in what way, though).
- Create a WIKI or something
(Thanks Roger and Adam for your earlier replies.)
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 16:59 +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
Moreover, z3c.form is complex, but it isn't hard if one knows what to do/how
to do - which leads me back to my WIKI idea...
Hermann,
This is a very good point. For those of us
thx for your replies! now i have new stuff to think about. :)
Can you give an example what you can't do with z3c.form?
i think z3c.form is in respect of what can be done with it general enough. i
can realize what i want to do with it plus i know how to do it. it isnt that
i dont understand
Hello,
I need use several layout templates in same layer for z3c.pagelet-based
browser views.
For this, in current project I did follow:
renderer.py:
from zope.component import getMultiAdapter
from z3c.template.interfaces import ILayoutTemplate
def layoutRenderer(self):
Allow to use
For example, default empty layout_name in pagelet directive handler (and not
use try ... except).
2008/10/9 Ilshad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I need use several layout templates in same layer for z3c.pagelet-based
browser views.
For this, in current project I did follow:
renderer.py:
from
Hi All,
What are your thoughts on the best way to implement the configure.zcml
files for this application framework?
The framework is a nested structure up to five levels deep in places of
approximately 150 classes.
Would it be better/more efficient to create a configure.zcml in each
package
14 matches
Mail list logo
