Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-22 Thread Shane Hathaway
David Pratt wrote: > Hi Shane, Roger and list. Personally, I think there needs to be > prioritization myself beginning with the essential packages to zca. zodb > would be next. I am not sure about anything else. My feeling is the rest > might need to be considered legacy. It would be unrealistic

Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-22 Thread David Pratt
Hi Shane, Roger and list. Personally, I think there needs to be prioritization myself beginning with the essential packages to zca. zodb would be next. I am not sure about anything else. My feeling is the rest might need to be considered legacy. It would be unrealistic to move forward with

Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-15 Thread Shane Hathaway
Roger Ineichen wrote: > I didn't say we should start the refactoring today or tomrrow. > But it whould be a good idea to talk about this painfull piece > of work. My personal wish is to see some dicussion about how > we do it instead of if we should do it now or later. The best thing to do now is

Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-15 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Mihamina > Betreff: Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3) > > Roger Ineichen wrote: > > The biggest problem I see with this refactoring is the > opposition from > > developers which like to stay with an older python version because > >

Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-15 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y)
Roger Ineichen wrote: > The biggest problem I see with this refactoring is the opposition > from developers which like to stay with an older python version > because they don't have time to update their projects. ... or have clients that dont want topay again. > That's normaly the biggest problem

Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-14 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Sebastian > Betreff: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3) > > Hello there, > > I'm just curious, do the Zope 3 developers think about Python > 3 and if yes, what? > > I mean, there is a lot of hype going on, but of course 2.6 is > perfe

Re: [Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-14 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15.01.2009 4:36 Uhr, Sebastian Bartos wrote: > Hello there, > > I'm just curious, do the Zope 3 developers think about Python 3 and if > yes, what? > > I mean, there is a lot of hype going on, but of course 2.6 is perfectly > fine and here on Ubun

[Zope3-Users] Are we following the flow (Python 3)

2009-01-14 Thread Sebastian Bartos
Hello there, I'm just curious, do the Zope 3 developers think about Python 3 and if yes, what? I mean, there is a lot of hype going on, but of course 2.6 is perfectly fine and here on Ubuntu the standard Zope 3 instance even uses 2.4 which also works out good. As far as I know, there is even mor