C:\optilux8005cd bin
C:\optilux8005\binbuildout
*While:
Initializing.
Error: Couldn't open C:\optilux8005\bin\buildout.cfg*
**
You are in the bin folder. Buildout cannot find buildout.cfg in the bin
folder because it is in the root folder of your buildout:
Copying buildout.cfg_tmpl
David Bear skrev:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:16:54PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little suprised that there isn't anything like urlparse
functionaly in zope. I would think parsing urls would be a fairly
common chore. Which leads me to think that I may be thinking
completely
HI Jim
Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the
xmlrpc layer discussionfinished)
[...]
Configure views on layers will prevent us form backdoors if
we reuse
this easy installable eggs ;-)
Here is a simple sample of such a built-in backdoor:
At our fresh zope
On Monday 17 December 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
WRT this use case, I strongly suspect it would be simpler and easier
to support defining multiple configurations in ZCML and a mechanism to
specify different configurations for different sites within an
instance. In fact, I think Stephan
On Monday 17 December 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
As a usecase take a forum application which should be installed more
than once in an instance but needs different layouts and also
different subset of functionality.
I don't have this use case. I wonder how many people do.
I certainly do
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Dec 17 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Dec 18 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Mon Dec 17 20:54:16 EST 2007
How does other software handle this? pytz, most importantly?
I found a bug report in Java about the same thing, and they said use
another name, i.e. Australia/Eastern or AEST, which are both
unambiguous.
And how does Brazilians solve it? They also have an EST.
On Dec 18, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
HI Jim
Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the
xmlrpc layer discussionfinished)
[...]
Configure views on layers will prevent us form backdoors if
we reuse
this easy installable eggs ;-)
Here is a simple sample of
On Monday 17 December 2007, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Layers and skins are a security concept. And a very good one.
Let me briefly explain what Roger refers to by the word security here. We
consider, as I mentioned in my previous mail, the availability of views
outside of our control a security
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
If we register absolute_url in a layer which isn't
used in a skin, then this view is not available as
traversable view because of the missing layer/named skin
configuration.
Which does nothing to protect you from components registered for
On Monday 17 December 2007, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
a couple of weeks ago there was some discussion about the skin/layer
support for XML-RPC which I implemented without asking (shame on me).
As some time has passed now everybody could have some fresh thoughts
about it.
Since the original
OK, I have looked HARD at this now. And dateutil.tz solves this. I
don't think Zope can solve this with pytz, unless we implement the
same solution in pytz as already exists in dateutil.tz. It solves it
by implementing a tzinfo class that wraps zoneinfo files, and that way
you simply wrap
Andreas Jung wrote:
the Zope 2.11 beta phase has been delayed for while. The reason for
holding but the release was Philipps and Hannos work on the
http://svn.zope.org/Zope/branches/philikon-aq/
branch. Unfortunately both can't work (lack of personal time) on the
branch and finish it in
--On 18. Dezember 2007 21:53:55 +0100 Hanno Schlichting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
the Zope 2.11 beta phase has been delayed for while. The reason for
holding but the release was Philipps and Hannos work on the
http://svn.zope.org/Zope/branches/philikon-aq/
branch.
14 matches
Mail list logo
