Re: [Zope] Finding an object in a folder

2005-05-26 Thread Alec Mitchell
On Thursday 26 May 2005 02:52 pm, Dieter Maurer wrote: > Chris Withers wrote at 2005-5-25 21:03 +0100: > > ... > > > >> I strongly argue against it. Fix "hasattr" in the Zope context, > >> instead! > > > >Make it so! :-) I'd add the ability to turn on/off acquisition (off by default, import aq_bas

Re: [Zope] Finding an object in a folder

2005-05-28 Thread Alec Mitchell
On Saturday 28 May 2005 01:26 am, Dieter Maurer wrote: > Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-5-27 11:08 -0400: > >On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote: > >> A higher risk comes from the fact that some Python packages may > >> rely on the broken "hasattr" behaviour. That's the reason

Re: [Zope] Re: Re: Poll: Zope and Suse Linux

2005-07-08 Thread Alec Mitchell
On Friday 08 July 2005 08:01 am, Tony Addyman wrote: > Peter Bengtsson wrote: > >> > The only negative that I know of comes with SuSE 9.3 Pro. Zope is > >> > compiled with Python 2.4! > >> > >> Why do these bastards ship Zope with an unsupported Python version... > >> unbelievable! Maybe a reason *

Re: [Zope] Problem with hasattr() and Zope 2.8.1

2005-09-30 Thread Alec Mitchell
ld probably heed the warning and avoid using it if at all possible. If these are methods that you created then just rename them to use a single or preferably no underscores if you need to use them from outside the class itself (a single underscore is still bad form, as '_' is an indica

Re: [Zope] CPU architecture and Zope

2006-01-10 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 1/9/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On 9. Januar 2006 21:38:15 -0800 David H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > Im just wondering what the wisdom is about Zope performance and various > > CPU types. I'm running Zope on Linux (Ubuntu). I notice that Dell is > >

Re: [Zope] Squishdot on Zope 2.9.X with Python 2.4

2006-02-28 Thread Alec Mitchell
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 07:10, Dennis Allison wrote: > OK, I'll do that. My post was to learn whether I was walking into a mine > field... In my experience, unless you are using Zope 3 technologies in Zope 2 (via Five) there is very little difference from a Product development point of view

Re: [Zope] What's the difference between 2.8.x and 2.9.x?

2006-05-31 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 5/31/06, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At Wednesday 31/5/2006 07:22, Lennart Regebro wrote: >> > after the annoucement of Zope 2.8.7 and 2.10.0.B1, I'm a bit confused >> > about the difference between the 2.8 and 2.9 lines? Is it mainly Python >> > 2.4 support? >> >>doc/CHANGES

Re: [Zope] Information about Zope 3.2

2006-06-06 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 6/6/06, Michael Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Plone doesn't run on Zope 3, so that migration would be a seriously >major undertaking (ie, reqrite from scratch). >>Please provide me information regarding this. > >http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/lennart_regebro/2005_10_04_zope2-vs-zop

Re: [Zope] __bobo_traverse__ and a no-object

2006-07-14 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 7/14/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garito wrote at 2006-7-14 07:04 +0200: > ... >def __bobo_traverse__(self, REQUEST, name): >obj = getattr(self, name, None) > ... >I wonder why I can do this on a Page Template: > > > >Where Texto is a adquired property, but not this: >

Re: [Zope] __bobo_traverse__ and a no-object

2006-07-14 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 7/14/06, Garito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garito escribió: > Dieter Maurer escribió: >> Garito wrote at 2006-7-14 07:04 +0200: >> >>> ... >>> def __bobo_traverse__(self, REQUEST, name): >>>obj = getattr(self, name, None) >>> ... >>> I wonder why I can do this on a Page Template: >>> >