Re: [Zope] And now for a good laugh (Re: [Zope] Zope and the GPL poison pill)

2000-09-14 Thread Lalo Martins
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:23:21AM +0200, Nils Kassube wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lalo Martins) wrote: > > > Renderable wasn't even GPL'ed to begin with. And this isn't a > > mistake; now that I think if it, I clearly remember having > > chosen the ZPL so that DC folks could easily take the chan

Re: [Zope] And now for a good laugh (Re: [Zope] Zope and the GPL poison pill)

2000-09-14 Thread Nils Kassube
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lalo Martins) wrote: > Renderable wasn't even GPL'ed to begin with. And this isn't a > mistake; now that I think if it, I clearly remember having > chosen the ZPL so that DC folks could easily take the changes > and merge them into Zope if they wished. My copy of Renderable ZC

[Zope] And now for a good laugh (Re: [Zope] Zope and the GPL poison pill)

2000-09-13 Thread Lalo Martins
I replied to the message below promising to edit Renderable's README to explicitly declare that I don't consider ZClass subclassing to be a derivative work for the purposes of the GPL. Somehow, I didn't get my reply from the list. But never mind. I went to my folder on Zope.org to edit the READM