+---[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
| Let me ask a more precise question.
|
| Zope is not released under GPL.
|
| Joe repleases a component which can be used with Zope under GPL license.
| Zope.org makes it available for download, but in no way incorporates
| it into their base s
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 08:27:47PM +0200, Erik Enge wrote:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> | Can she distribute Zope, Joe's product, and her own product, as long
> | as they are packaged separately?
>
> What is defined as "package separately". Different .rpms/.tgz,
> different CDs, or what?
I Don't
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Can she distribute Zope, Joe's product, and her own product, as long
| as they are packaged separately?
What is defined as "package separately". Different .rpms/.tgz,
different CDs, or what?
___
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 01:05:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Joan uses Zope with Joe's component (Product in Zope parlance).
> She writes something that depends on Joe's product being present,
So her work must be GPLed too, because it's considered just like
she links with a GPLed library.
Let me ask a more precise question.
Zope is not released under GPL.
Joe repleases a component which can be used with Zope under GPL license.
Zope.org makes it available for download, but in no way incorporates
it into their base system. (I.e., it is available for integration
by an end user).
J
[Nils Kassube]
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Free Software Foundation) [Bradley M. Kuhn]
|
| It sounds like you are building software that combines Zope and
| GPL'ed software to form a single, larger program. In this case, the
| whole larger program falls under the terms of the GPL.
I don't exact
== Forwarded Message ==
Date: 19.09.2000 16:57 Uhr
Received: 19.09.2000 22:58 Uhr
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Free Software Foundation)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nils Kassube)
Nils Kassube wrote:
> If I use a GPL'ed component in a complex object oriented environment
> like Zope, does this mean
