Paul Sue wrote at 2005-9-6 08:39 -0700:
> ...
>Fair enough, but surely there must be SOMEONE on this list that is running
>Zope/Plone on Solaris???
We did (but do no more because PC hardware is *much* faster at a lower
price). We had few Solaris related problems (none apart from
occational "impos
Chris Withers wrote:
|> OK ... But surely, there must be some way to get Zope/Plone working on
Solaris!
|>
|> I think we have Windows Server 2003 box I can try :)
|
|I'd suggest that is a better option than Solaris, there are more people doing
it in the real world, and so you're more |likely to
Paul Sue wrote:
OK ... But surely, there must be some way to get Zope/Plone working on Solaris!
I think we have Windows Server 2003 box I can try :)
I'd suggest that is a better option than Solaris, there are more people
doing it in the real world, and so you're more likely to get help if
s
Paul Sue wrote at 2005-9-1 18:38 -0700:
> ...
> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/inspect.py", line 751, in getframeinfo
>lines, lnum = findsource(frame)
> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/inspect.py", line 435, in findsource
>if pat.match(lines[lnum]): break
>IndexError: list index out of ran
: [Zope] Zope startup error: Archetypes: IndexError: list index out
of range
Paul Sue wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, I rebuilt Zope because I think last time, I didn't have a clean directory.
Simple advise: don't use Solaris unless you really really have to.
Especially not for an app serve
Paul Sue wrote:
Hi,
OK, I rebuilt Zope because I think last time, I didn't have a clean directory.
Simple advise: don't use Solaris unless you really really have to.
Especially not for an app server, but even running a storage server will
cause you unnecessary pain...
Chris
--
Simplistix
On 2 Sep 2005, at 02:38, Paul Sue wrote:
Why is it so hard to get Zope going under Solaris (is that why
there were separate downloads
for Solaris until 2.7 ??)
Since this is an Archetypes question you might be better off asking
on a Plone and/or Archetypes list.
Running Zope on Solar
