RE: [Zope] zope vs. memory [was Re: Refcounts, ZODB Cache and memory leaks?]

2005-05-31 Thread Dieter Maurer
Andy Yates wrote at 2005-5-30 22:52 -0500: > ... >When you fixed the TempStorage the leak indeed slowed down >significantly. However, Zope still leaks memory. If left uncheck Zope >will still consume all available memory and crash the server. We have >resigned ourselves to restarting Zope every

RE: [Zope] zope vs. memory [was Re: Refcounts, ZODB Cache and memory leaks?]

2005-05-30 Thread Andy Yates
> > Some moths ago, I found such a leak in the "TempStorage" > implementation. However, this is fixed in recent Zope versions > (I think since 2.7.5). > When you fixed the TempStorage the leak indeed slowed down significantly. However, Zope still leaks memory. If left uncheck Zope will still con

RE: [Zope] zope vs. memory [was Re: Refcounts, ZODB Cache and memory leaks?]

2005-05-30 Thread Dieter Maurer
Please stay on the list! Readded... Dylan Jay wrote at 2005-5-29 23:31 +1000: >> >- Memory grows and mostly doesn't shrink. >> >> That's normal behavior. > >Normal as in desirable or normal as in known bug? Normal as in "extremely difficult to avoid". When you read a book about memory manageme

Re: [Zope] zope vs. memory [was Re: Refcounts, ZODB Cache and memory leaks?]

2005-05-13 Thread Dieter Maurer
Dylan Jay wrote at 2005-5-13 14:01 +1000: >Just in case anyone can shed anymore light on zope memory woes, here is >where I've got to in my investigation: > >- Memory grows and mostly doesn't shrink. That's normal behavior. >- Its not due to objects that can't be collected by the GC >- Its not d