Re: [Zope] Messing with the namespaces stack [Was: (no subject)]

2000-06-30 Thread Jim Hebert
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Shane Hathaway wrote: Actually what you did is pretty clever, Jim. It even relies on stable interfaces. Uh oh, careful, I'm encouragable and you'll really have a monster on your hands. ;-) The reason for the inner dtml-with is that my pages are DTML Methods, not OK,

Re: [Zope] Messing with the namespaces stack [Was: (no subject)]

2000-06-30 Thread Shane Hathaway
Jim Hebert wrote: OK, I am just going to go ahead and spill the rest of what swirled around in my head about zope when I threw up this vistasource.com site, in the hopes that I'll either get another ego stroke (*grin*) or some more insights as to the reason why things are done the way they

Re: [Zope] Messing with the namespaces stack [Was: (no subject)]

2000-06-30 Thread Jeff K. Hoffman
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Shane Hathaway wrote: Also remember you can play tricks with acquisition. If you have a "default" style and a "lowres" style, you can set up your directories like this: /home /lowres /content "lowres" and "content" are both children of "home". The default

Re: [Zope] Messing with the namespaces stack [Was: (no subject)]

2000-06-30 Thread Jim Hebert
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Shane Hathaway wrote: It's a great idea but I've had some thoughts on this myself. I think the approach I would take is to create a ZClass. Content authors would Oooh, I like that idea a lot. Solves lots of problems, most notably the hackery I currently do with the