-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even though Z2.12
> is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using all the CA goodness, I
> still can't easily develop using those methods.
Going on Five years now, I
I know of Five but I must admit I'm not that well acquainted with it. On the
contrary, I was under the impression that Five was going to be falling out
of usefulness as ZTK was being integrated in Z2. Thanks for clearing this up
for me.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> O
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:53, Jim Pharis wrote:
> So the line you reference in site.zcml is the same for me, and it says look
> in package-includes/*-configure.zcml. That child dir wasn't actually created
> though so theres nothing in it.
That's correct. But your question was where that director
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:47, Jim Pharis wrote:
> What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead of just
> using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now available in Zope2 well
> still being able to use all our Zope 2 Products. I thought basing Zope2.12
> on ZTK bridged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> for="Test.interfaces.INewTestSite"
>contents="zope.ManageContent"
>index="zope.View"
>add="zope.ManageContent"
>/>
>
> ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File
> "/home/binbrain/Programs/Zope2.1
So far I had just tried developing a site and allow it to be Added and
Viewed in the ZMI.
In the Z2.12 instance/etc/site.zcml I have...
In the browser dir I put a configure.zcml.
ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File
"/home/binbrain/Programs/Zope2.12/instance/lib/python/Test/browser/configur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even though Z2.12
> is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using all the CA goodness, I
> still can't easily develop using those methods. So I'm left leaving this
> c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even
> though Z2.12 is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using
> all the CA goodness, I still can't easily develop using those
> methods. So I'm left leaving this c
Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even though Z2.12
is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using all the CA goodness, I
still can't easily develop using those methods. So I'm left leaving this
conversation thinking that I'm back to developing Products using the
esote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> Jim Pharis wrote:
>> I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere.
>> I
> still need
>> these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2
>> Products
> behind.
>
> There seems to be a misunderstanding wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere. I still need
> these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2 Products behind.
There seems to be a misunderstanding what the ZTK is and what it isn't.
The Z
I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere. I still need
these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2 Products behind.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Pharis wrote:
>
> >
>
> > I want t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
>
> I want to start developing new stuff using CA paradigms in Z2.
So *why* Zope 2?
The ZTK/Zope 3 modules provide a much cleaner
basis for new projects than the Zope 2 app-server. So what is
in Zope 3/ZTK missing? Why do you need
So developing in Z3 had several perceived benefits no? The problem is that
in many cases existing projects couldn't just move to Z3 and start using the
CA. From Z3 development was born ZTK, a modular CA implementation that Z2
could now leverage, and I thought in theory all the Z3 CA goodness was no
So the line you reference in site.zcml is the same for me, and it says look
in package-includes/*-configure.zcml. That child dir wasn't actually created
though so theres nothing in it.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 01:28, Jim Pharis wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead
> of just using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now
> available in Zope2 well still being able to use all our Zope 2
> Products. I thought basing Zope2.12
What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead of just
using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now available in Zope2 well
still being able to use all our Zope 2 Products. I thought basing Zope2.12
on ZTK bridged the 2 worlds.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Andreas J
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 01:28, Jim Pharis wrote:
> I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zope2.12 can mean for
> how I develop in Zope2 now. I've developed things in Zope3 and am getting
> stuck attempting the same methods in Zope2.12. So I see now that etc/ now
> has a site.zcml.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12
> on ZTK eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be
> developed in a similar way to how its done in Zope3, ie placing
> your site in instance/lib/pyt
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12 on ZTK
eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be developed in a
similar way to how its done in Zope3, ie placing your site in
instance/lib/python/ and wiring it all together using the site.zcml
now present in the Zo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zope2.12 can
> mean for how I develop in Zope2 now. I've developed things in
> Zope3 and am getting stuck attempting the same methods in Zope2.12.
> So I see now that etc/ now ha
21 matches
Mail list logo