On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Sean Upton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> mechanism or implementation details underneath, so I think I'll
>> continue to use custom field types marked with an IRelationshipField
>> interface, and
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Sean Upton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mechanism or implementation details underneath, so I think I'll
> continue to use custom field types marked with an IRelationshipField
> interface, and assume the built-in Object, List fields are only used
> for containment. T
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still another approach, if you're looking to create software support
> and the first isn't suitable, is to use fields that provide additional
> interfaces that indicate the nature of the references.
My application (and I suspe
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Sean Upton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to be able to spell out certain zope.schema.Object fields in my
> interfaces as "contained" while other fields are declared as
Are you using a source or vocabulary? If so, this could be part of
the nature of the values
