On 12/2/10 12:18 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Alex Clark wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm afraid I'm already confused :-). Is templer.core the zopeskel
>> package renamed?
>>
>
>
> I wish it were a bit less confusing, but let me try to explain.
>
> zopeskel as it currently exists w
On Dec 1, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Alex Clark wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I'm already confused :-). Is templer.core the zopeskel
> package renamed?
>
I wish it were a bit less confusing, but let me try to explain.
zopeskel as it currently exists will eventually be replaced by an empty egg
which simply
Hi Chris,
Thanks for tackling this!
On 12/1/10 5:03 PM, Cristopher Ewing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after a longer-than-expected period of development, I am happy to
> announce the first beta release of templer.core 1.0b1.
>
> This new package is the first step in the breakup of the zopskel package
> i