The game starts at 5 so there will be a break in traffic between 5:30 &7:30

--
Some radio waves were modulated in the sending of this email

On Nov 16, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Matt Stumbaugh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey all,
> 
> Chris and I will be talking about numpy on Thursday.  That said, I
> can't tell if I'm getting nervous b/c we're on the hook for that or if
> it's that combined with the potential traffic mayhem some of us may
> encounter trying to get from NE Seattle to Office Nomads and back.  I
> definitely look forward to discussing numpy but I'm pretty
> apprehensive about the traffic (Metro is going to be rerouting the
> 68/372/31 lines starting at 2:30 pm).  I hate to potentially mess up
> the meeting planning nor do I want to say let's re-schedule (though my
> gut tells me it would be wise)... so I'm looking for some objective
> metric by which to make the decision (not that it's really mine to
> make) or gain some peace that it's going to be alright.  To that end,
> I'm wondering
> 1) how many are planning on attending?
> 2) how many will be departing from/returning to north of 520 or the east side?
> 3) how many will just decide to skip it b/c traffic is going to be too 
> painful?
> 4) your thoughts?
> 
> Here are some links that discuss the associated traffic:
> 
> http://metrocommute.wordpress.com/2010/11/15/thursday-night-husky-game-expect-uw-area-transit-service-delays-campus-reroutes/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
> 
> http://metro.kingcounty.gov/up/rr/reroutes.html
> 
> http://blog.seattlepi.com/huskies/archives/227886.asp
> 
> Not directly relevant but interesting,
> http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Northwest/King/ExpressLanes/I-5HuskyGames.htm
> 
> Go Dawgs!  (Don't hate b/c they're screwing up our traffic :-)
> 
> Matt
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Matt Stumbaugh <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [SEAPY] November meeting confirmed
> To: Mike Orr <[email protected]>
> 
> 
>> So it's at Office Nomads, not the UW.
> 
> Yeah, I realized that but was thinking it's going to be a nasty p.m.
> for car or transit.  Especially problematic if one is coming from
> north of 520.  And getting back north or east on 520 will be bad too.
> I can man up and get there but think there may be some major headaches
> for anyone planning on getting to/from the meeting between 3:30 to
> 10:30 pm.
> 
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Matt Stumbaugh
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hey Mike,
>>> 
>>> I'm a bit concerned that next Thursday is going to present some
>>> serious transportation problems with a Husky game on Montlake from
>>> 5:30-9 (not to mention rush hour).  Do you have an opinion on this or
>>> do you want to query the seapy folks (or me to do so)?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Barker
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 10/28/10 10:35 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The November meeting will be on November 18th, a week later than usual
>>>>> due to Veteran's Day. That's the week before Thanksgiving. The meeting
>>>>> will be at Office Nomads, 7-9pm.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris Barker will give his long-awaited talk about NumPy.
>>>> 
>>>> Make that Chris Barker and Matt Stumbaugh.
>>>> 
>>>>> Chris, can
>>>>> you remind us what specifically you'll be covering?
>>>> 
>>>> We haven't nailed down the outline yet, but we'll introduce numpy, discuss
>>>> why you'd want to us it (even if you aren't crunching numbers), and show
>>>> some nifty examples.
>>>> 
>>>> We'll put a more detailed outline in the Wiki at some point.
>>>> 
>>>> -Chris
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
>>>> Oceanographer
>>>> 
>>>> Emergency Response Division
>>>> NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
>>>> 7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
>>>> Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception
>>>> 
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mike Orr <[email protected]>
>> 

Reply via email to