I may live to regret it, but I'm a Google man (almost) all the way (I
haven't yet gotten a Google OS product, and I still use Mozilla-based
browsers, and use my old yahoo account for spam-risky activity, but
otherwise Google "has me"!)  If you move to GG, that "works for me."


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:39 PM, <[email protected]>wrote:

> Send seattle-python mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.seapig.org/mailman/listinfo/seattle-python
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of seattle-python digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re:  SeaPIG server status (Mike Orr)
>    2. Re:  SeaPIG server status (James Thiele)
>    3. Re:  SeaPIG server status (Kevin LaTona)
>    4. Re:  SeaPIG server status (Mike Orr)
>    5. Re:  SeaPIG server status (joseph simpson)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:36:31 -0700
> From: Mike Orr <[email protected]>
> To: Seattle Python Interest Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SEAPY] SeaPIG server status
> Message-ID:
>         <CAH9f=uo919nhv8s48FfjCoXXVP1CwduQK7bu5=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:11 PM, bass <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > For mail, have you considered switching to say, Google Groups, so you
> > don't have to worry about issues like disk space?
> >
>
> We have considered it in the past and it's still a possibility. The main
> issues are:
>
> - How many people don't have Google accounts?
> - How many people are resistant to getting a Google account?
> - Can we expect everybody to resubscribe without people falling through the
> cracks?
> - Is it possible to bulk-add the subscriber list? If so, is it ethical to
> do so?
> - Should we purge the subscriber list anyway because it probably has
> out-of-date cruft going back ten years?
> - How can we keep in touch and announce the next meeting if the migration
> fails or people fall through the cracks?
> - Are there any non-Google list services we should consider, especially any
> that don't practice Total Information Awareness and Ever-Creeping
> Marketing?
> - Are there any SeaPIG members who have a reliable mail server running and
> would like to take this on?
>
> When I've suggested Google Groups in the past, enthusiasm was mediocre and
> resistance was present. How do people feel about it now?  It would be nice
> to get out of the burden of running Mailman and having it be a
> must-reliable whenever I upgrade the server.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.seapig.org/pipermail/seattle-python/attachments/20130412/a2c82a43/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:42:18 -0700
> From: James Thiele <[email protected]>
> To: Seattle Python Interest Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SEAPY] SeaPIG server status
> Message-ID:
>         <CABSNL97yZYW5jpUOPnD=aGUtHL0=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I wouldn't resist, but I'm not enthusiastic. What we have mostly works. I'd
> hate to lose any member of the community by moving. Also we have control. I
> have a Google account but I swear at them every time they change the email
> interface. Who knows if they might move Google Groups to Google+?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:11 PM, bass <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> For mail, have you considered switching to say, Google Groups, so you
> >> don't have to worry about issues like disk space?
> >>
> >
> > We have considered it in the past and it's still a possibility. The main
> > issues are:
> >
> > - How many people don't have Google accounts?
> > - How many people are resistant to getting a Google account?
> > - Can we expect everybody to resubscribe without people falling through
> > the cracks?
> > - Is it possible to bulk-add the subscriber list? If so, is it ethical to
> > do so?
> > - Should we purge the subscriber list anyway because it probably has
> > out-of-date cruft going back ten years?
> > - How can we keep in touch and announce the next meeting if the migration
> > fails or people fall through the cracks?
> > - Are there any non-Google list services we should consider, especially
> > any that don't practice Total Information Awareness and Ever-Creeping
> > Marketing?
> > - Are there any SeaPIG members who have a reliable mail server running
> and
> > would like to take this on?
> >
> > When I've suggested Google Groups in the past, enthusiasm was mediocre
> and
> > resistance was present. How do people feel about it now?  It would be
> nice
> > to get out of the burden of running Mailman and having it be a
> > must-reliable whenever I upgrade the server.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Some radio waves were modulated in the creation of this email.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.seapig.org/pipermail/seattle-python/attachments/20130412/04bee5e1/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:07:28 -0700
> From: Kevin LaTona <[email protected]>
> To: Seattle Python Interest Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SEAPY] SeaPIG server status
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
>
>
> Not much mail comes across the seaPig list, so if a move to Google
> Groups makes it easier for you I would be in favor of the move.
>
> Also Carter Rabasa from Twilio just created a new Seattle based news
> website/feed on all things Seattle developer like.
>
> He is using Github and Jekyll to create the static pages and it's a
> pretty straight forward process to keep it going.
>
> http://seattlehacks.com/
>
> http://seattlehacks.com/submit/
>
>
>
> Maybe it's time to consider moving away from the old website model and
> moving over to this kind of an idea.
>
> This way Mike you end not having to do all those server upgrades and
> it's free as well.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Kevin
>
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:11 PM, bass <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For mail, have you considered switching to say, Google Groups, so
> > you don't have to worry about issues like disk space?
> >
> > We have considered it in the past and it's still a possibility. The
> > main issues are:
> >
> > - How many people don't have Google accounts?
> > - How many people are resistant to getting a Google account?
> > - Can we expect everybody to resubscribe without people falling
> > through the cracks?
> > - Is it possible to bulk-add the subscriber list? If so, is it
> > ethical to do so?
> > - Should we purge the subscriber list anyway because it probably has
> > out-of-date cruft going back ten years?
> > - How can we keep in touch and announce the next meeting if the
> > migration fails or people fall through the cracks?
> > - Are there any non-Google list services we should consider,
> > especially any that don't practice Total Information Awareness and
> > Ever-Creeping Marketing?
> > - Are there any SeaPIG members who have a reliable mail server
> > running and would like to take this on?
> >
> > When I've suggested Google Groups in the past, enthusiasm was
> > mediocre and resistance was present. How do people feel about it
> > now?  It would be nice to get out of the burden of running Mailman
> > and having it be a must-reliable whenever I upgrade the server.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:32:38 -0700
> From: Mike Orr <[email protected]>
> To: Seattle Python Interest Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SEAPY] SeaPIG server status
> Message-ID:
>         <CAH9f=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Kevin LaTona <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Not much mail comes across the seaPig list, so if a move to Google Groups
> > makes it easier for you I would be in favor of the move.
> >
> > Also Carter Rabasa from Twilio just created a new Seattle based news
> > website/feed on all things Seattle developer like.
> >
> > He is using Github and Jekyll to create the static pages and it's a
> pretty
> > straight forward process to keep it going.
> >
> > http://seattlehacks.com/
> >
> > http://seattlehacks.com/**submit/ <http://seattlehacks.com/submit/>
> >
> >
> >
> > Maybe it's time to consider moving away from the old website model and
> > moving over to this kind of an idea.
> >
> > This way Mike you end not having to do all those server upgrades and it's
> > free as well.
>
>
> What do others think of this? Or are there other models we should consider?
> The SeaPIG organizers could contact Carter and see what kind of
> collaboration is feasable. The main issues are making sure we don't lose
> our community or alienate members, and that it has equivalents to all the
> wiki features we currently use. This probably means we'd need our own
> section on the site.  Given that Seattle Py (the meetup group) is already
> on there, we should have at least a presence there to avoid people's
> confusion. ("Are Seattle Py and SeaPIG the same thing?" "Seattle Py is the
> only group around.")
>
> So how was Seattle Hacks started, and how representative it is of the
> Seattle developer community? Are there other groups with a similar long
> history and community as SeaPIG, that have managed to associate with it
> without losing their identity or cohesiveness? If so, who are they and what
> kind of association do they have?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.seapig.org/pipermail/seattle-python/attachments/20130412/3cb1a58c/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:38:54 -0700
> From: joseph simpson <[email protected]>
> To: Seattle Python Interest Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SEAPY] SeaPIG server status
> Message-ID:
>         <CAPnyebxzkKECU=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> JoeHey...
>
> Google Groups is a great service....
>
> I use it with other groups and it works fine...
>
> But Brian Dorsey is  not a member of the other groups so it may be
> iffy........ ; )
>
>
> Have fun..
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Kevin LaTona <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Not much mail comes across the seaPig list, so if a move to Google
> Groups
> >> makes it easier for you I would be in favor of the move.
> >>
> >> Also Carter Rabasa from Twilio just created a new Seattle based news
> >> website/feed on all things Seattle developer like.
> >>
> >> He is using Github and Jekyll to create the static pages and it's a
> >> pretty straight forward process to keep it going.
> >>
> >> http://seattlehacks.com/
> >>
> >> http://seattlehacks.com/**submit/ <http://seattlehacks.com/submit/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Maybe it's time to consider moving away from the old website model and
> >> moving over to this kind of an idea.
> >>
> >> This way Mike you end not having to do all those server upgrades and
> it's
> >> free as well.
> >
> >
> > What do others think of this? Or are there other models we should
> > consider? The SeaPIG organizers could contact Carter and see what kind of
> > collaboration is feasable. The main issues are making sure we don't lose
> > our community or alienate members, and that it has equivalents to all the
> > wiki features we currently use. This probably means we'd need our own
> > section on the site.  Given that Seattle Py (the meetup group) is already
> > on there, we should have at least a presence there to avoid people's
> > confusion. ("Are Seattle Py and SeaPIG the same thing?" "Seattle Py is
> the
> > only group around.")
> >
> > So how was Seattle Hacks started, and how representative it is of the
> > Seattle developer community? Are there other groups with a similar long
> > history and community as SeaPIG, that have managed to associate with it
> > without losing their identity or cohesiveness? If so, who are they and
> what
> > kind of association do they have?
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Simpson
>
> Sent From My DROID!!
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.seapig.org/pipermail/seattle-python/attachments/20130412/d2c1a92e/attachment.html
> >
>
> End of seattle-python Digest, Vol 108, Issue 4
> **********************************************
>



-- 
>From "A Letter From The Future" in "Peak Everything" by Richard Heinberg:

"By the time I was an older teenager, a certain...attitude was developing
among the young people...a feeling of utter contempt for anyone over a
certain age--maybe 30 or 40.  The adults had consumed so many resources,
and now there were none left for their own children...when those adults
were younger, they [were] just doing what everybody else was doing...they
figured it was normal to cut down ancient forests for...phone books, pump
every last gallon of oil to power their SUV's...[but] for...my generation
all that was just a dim memory...We [grew up] living in darkness, with
shortages of food and water, with riots in the streets, with people begging
on street corners...for us, the adults were the enemy."

Want to *really* understand what's *really* going on?  Read "Peak
Everything."

Reply via email to