Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On 2001-08-08, Trevor Antczak wrote:
>
>>> A possible workaround for the speed issue would be to try booting with
>>> lilo arg "mem=128M" and see if having less memory helps.
>>
>> OK. That helped a lot. X still doesn't work, but the system is much
>> more responsive. I am going to experiment and see how much RAM is too
>> much. Now the big question (other than how to get X running) is "how
>> can I make it use all the RAM well. I assume this is a kernel config,
>> but I cannot find a "increase RAM usage" option. Any ideas are once
>> again appreciated
>
>
> This *IS* the "increase RAM usage" option. :)
But I am telling it to use less RAM. I am up to mem =1024M and still
seeing good performance, but evenetually I need to get to ram=8192M, and
still get good performance. Is this not possible?
--
Thank you,
Trevor Antczak
Network Administrator II
Tulane University Math Dept.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(504) 862-3457
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
