On Sunday 12 August 2001 07:29 pm, J. Dow wrote:
> From: "Devon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > more useful if they told the public to open a dos window, and type
> > netstat -p tcp and look for port 80. Hell, as long as they are
> > looking,
>
> Doesn't work. Here is the report from my W2K machine (addresses
obscured):
> >netstat -p tcp
Oh, very nice! Not only is it insecure, it doesn't even report just how
insecure it is. ;)
I'd considered suggesting the -a option, and decided it was over kill.
You'll have to excuse me, I've been Windows free for over a year now. :)
Actually, that's not quite true, there are 2 Windows machines (win 98)
left on my network. One belongs to a 4 year old, and the other to a 6
year old. I'm just not ready to teach them the wonders of Linux quite
yet. :)
> >netstat -a
>
> Active Connections
>
> Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
> ....
> TCP XXXXXXXXX:http XXXXXXXXX:0 LISTENING
> ....
> TCP XXXXXXXXX:https XXXXXXXXX:0 LISTENING
> --9<--
Being as these are TCP protocol, one would expect the -p tcp option to
netstat to expose them, no?
> Ah yup - and depreciation being what it is this is my $0.25 (worth
> less than that aforementioned 1/50th of a dollar was when I was
> born.)
Hrmm, I can still (vaguely) remember when that $0.25 would get you a
cup of coffee, or the better part of a gallon of gasoline. :)
-D
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list