On Sunday 12 August 2001 07:29 pm, J. Dow wrote:
> From: "Devon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > more useful if they told the public to open a dos window, and type
> > netstat -p tcp and look for port 80. Hell, as long as they are
> > looking,
>
> Doesn't work. Here is the report from my W2K machine (addresses 
obscured):
> >netstat -p tcp

Oh, very nice! Not only is it insecure, it doesn't even report just how 
insecure it is. ;)

I'd considered suggesting the -a option, and decided it was over kill.
You'll have to excuse me, I've been Windows free for over a year now. :)
Actually, that's not quite true, there are 2 Windows machines (win 98) 
left on my network. One belongs to a 4 year old, and the other to a 6 
year old. I'm just not ready to teach them the wonders of Linux quite 
yet. :)

> >netstat -a
>
> Active Connections
>
>   Proto  Local Address          Foreign Address        State
>   ....
>   TCP    XXXXXXXXX:http         XXXXXXXXX:0            LISTENING
>   ....
>   TCP    XXXXXXXXX:https        XXXXXXXXX:0            LISTENING
> --9<--

Being as these are TCP protocol, one would expect the -p tcp option to 
netstat to expose them, no?

> Ah yup - and depreciation being what it is this is my $0.25 (worth
> less than that aforementioned 1/50th of a dollar was when I was
> born.)

Hrmm, I can still (vaguely) remember when that $0.25 would get you a 
cup of coffee, or the better part of a gallon of gasoline. :)

-D



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to