On 2001-09-19, Matthias Saou wrote: >Well, IIRC there was a version dated 1997 on rpm.org not so long ago, but >there now is a link to a new "under development" version. Also, the one on >Red Hat's site is (c) 2000... The preface is 1997, though. Probably the (c) 2000 refers to just the HTML and PDF versions. _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
- i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Ross Macintyre
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Matthias Saou
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Eric Wood
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Eric Wood
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Matthias Saou
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Tom Diehl
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) rpjday
- Re: i386 or 686 RPM installed? - (use of RPM) Matthias Saou
- Michael Schwendt