Hi all,

     The new errata kernel for Seawolf doesn't have a devfsd package.  The 
question I have concerns the best way to maintain an installation tree.  
Should one keep the devfsd-2.4.3-12.i386.rpm, or remove devfsd 
altogether.  If devfsd should be removed, is it necessary to change 
Anaconda so the missing package won't cause the installation to fail?




          TIA.
          Bill in Denver




_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to