Hi all, The new errata kernel for Seawolf doesn't have a devfsd package. The question I have concerns the best way to maintain an installation tree. Should one keep the devfsd-2.4.3-12.i386.rpm, or remove devfsd altogether. If devfsd should be removed, is it necessary to change Anaconda so the missing package won't cause the installation to fail?
TIA. Bill in Denver _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list