On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, David Vos wrote: > Does RedHat plan on releasing an rpm update from the beta gcc to a full > version (i.e. 3)?
2.96 is NOT a beta, and actually more stable than 3.0.anything (which can't even compile KDE). > I upgraded a production system from RH6.2 to 7.1 > tentatively because of the compiler version (which has given us some > trouble). Are you sure it's a problem with the compiler rather than your code? gcc >= 2.96 is pretty strict about enforcing ISO C/ISO C++ compliance, see http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html LLaP bero -- This message is provided to you under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
