On 15 Nov 2001, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote: > It is a separately maintained branch, and currently the best one > available - gcc3 was both very delayed and rushed. Also, gcc3 is > binary compatible with all other gcc releases (including 2.96RH) for > C++ so using it wouldn't be an option even if it was ready.
Thanks for the clarification. After writing a simple compiler, I know that there is absolutly no way I want to work on a compiler like that. Thank you guys for helping write it! David _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
