David Scriven wrote: > > I stand corrected - the word I should have used was > 'suggested' as in "you will find a recent update > at this site".
> Whatever the case, gcc 2.96-85 DOES > have bugs (I have a large amount of code that works > perfectly on other compilers to attest to this) Does > Red Hat 'recommend' the Rawhide 2.96-99 rpm > as a solution? Well, Give URL to the code, sequence of events to reproduce. Give more infos, Give test cases. _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
