On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 06:25:29PM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> David Scriven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I stand corrected - the word I should have used was 'suggested' as
> > in "you will find a recent update at this site". Whatever the case,
> > gcc 2.96-85 DOES have bugs (I have a large amount of code that works
> > perfectly on other compilers to attest to this) Does Red Hat
> > 'recommend' the Rawhide 2.96-99 rpm as a solution?
>
> Not until we release it as part of a distribution or as an official
> update.
Actually, in case of gcc, you want gcc-2.96-NN where NN is the latest from
Red Hat you find (including rawhide), but this is for gcc-2.96 only and not
a general rule. The intent is that every new gcc rpm should be a good errata
candidate (but unless you want a sparc gcc-2.96, 2.96-98 and 2.96-99 are
otherwise the same).
Jakub
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
