* Moritz Muehlenhoff: >> IMHO the correct thing to do is to mark it as unfixed. Then if it >> somehow re-enters testing later from sid, we will see it and go make >> sure the new version is fixed. If it's marked as <removed> we'll miss >> that check. > > This is only for packages completely removed from the archive, not for > packages removed solely from testing.
Obviously, we mean different things with "removed from the archive". When I used this phrase in the past, I meant it literally, that is, the package is not present in woody, sarge, etch, sid (I ignore experimental, admittedly). I implemented <removed> for my tracker. Right now, it just means the same as <unfixed>. Semantically, there isn't a real difference, but it could be used to generate more informative status reports in the future. _______________________________________________ Secure-testing-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/secure-testing-team
