> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nina V. Levitin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: scary site
> 
> This is yet another reason to stick with Netscape.  And yet another
reason
> why separating out Windows and Internet Explorer should be mandated.
> 
> -Kit
>

Unfortunately, that isn't the correct answer; to me, that's the
equivalent of sticking your head in the sand. Even though I agree that
users should have the ability to separate Internet Explorer from
Windows, the relationship between the two programs has absolutely no
bearing on whether they provide adequate security to end users. 

While we can't deny the fact that Internet Explorer has inherent
security flaws (as most programs do), we have for the most part, ignored
the program's security features that otherwise would have helped prevent
this type of problem. 

I'm not absolving Microsoft of any responsibility, but I do think we
should be aware of, and utilize all security features before labeling a
problem like this one, as being huge and scary. To some this is scary,
to others just a feature of active scripting. Regardless, good job to
those who first discovered it.

I do think this scripting feature can be a security risk; however, it is
no more of a problem, than inviting strangers to your home or keeping
your front door unlocked. We've all learned (hopefully) to avoid those
risks, and this situation really isn't any different. Use the locks
provided, and your risk will be somewhat reduced.

Microsoft has a long way to go before all their programs are bug free
and somewhat secure; but in the mean time, we can protect ourselves not
only by using firewalls and installing patches, but by using the
built-in security features as well. None of that helps of course if you
leave the door wide open or hand out copies of your key; and that's
basically what you're doing when you use only a fraction of the tools at
your disposal. 


[Now for the built in solution to this and similar problems]

Even though disabling active scripting solves the problem, most people
would agree that it isn't the most practical solution. You do however
have the ability to set active scripting to 'prompt', and then include
in the 'Trusted Sites' web content zone, the sites you frequent the
most. After a week or so of using Internet Explorer, most people will
have added their favorite sites to the list, and find that the script
prompts are kept to a minimum.

Determining if a script is benign without looking at the code first is
impossible; but using the 'Trusted Sites' content zone correctly is
certainly better than allowing all scripts to run. This also enables you
to browse your favorite sites without any loss in functionality.

I'm sure that this may be cumbersome if you continually visit a
multitude of sites each day (or even perhaps when using a search
engine), but it's much safer than waiting for a security patch that will
never come. If you truly want your computer to be immune from every
internet security risk, unplug it, and never turn it on. Unfortunately
an increase in security generally implies a decrease in usability... but
then again, we all knew that.

Regards,

James Kivisild




On a similar note, if you're not using the privacy settings in IE to
restrict cookies, you should be.


Reply via email to