> number of reasons. Can people here suggest a low-cost (or free), > secure, easy-to-administer replacement??
Apache. Version 1.3.x of Apache doesn't perform as well as IIS when running on windows, but since you said it was a low volume web site, it should be fine. If you need the performance, you can try the new Apache 2.x. The initial benchmarks shows that it performs as well as IIS when running on windows. Apache 2.x is pretty new, but I'll bet it's still far more secure than IIS. Steve Bremer
