On 2003-07-19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a second desktop and I would like to host a http, ftp, smtp, > and mysql servers. this second desktop must route my traffic from my > first desktop and be use as a firewall. It will be an heterogenous > network because I think it's better to host servers on linux OS; my > first desktop is a multi OS XP - redhat system > > I have the following questions: > is there some problems from hosting webserver on the firewall?
Yes. Do not run servers on firewalls. Just don't. Every service allowing inbound connections which runs on your firewall adds a potential security breach. > I can't buy dedied firewall... Depends. Small routers (e.g. from Netgear) aren't *that* expensive and I don't assume you are going to need a Cisco or something for your private LAN. What kind of connection do you have? > which kind of operating system is better? I would have yours tips; I > suppose that debian is better, but I'm not sure that I have > qualifications for administrate it. redhat is a good choice? There is no such thing like a "better" Operating System. The answer to your question depends much on your knowledge. If you're familiar with RedHat, then I suggest you stick with it (though I would prefer Debian). Debian is IMHO a lot easier to cut down to a minimum of services, but it is different from RedHat. > and wich kind of steps must don't be forgiven in settings? If you don't know what a daemon does, disable it. If you don't know why a port is open, close it. Run as few services as possible. Keep them up to date. Consider alternatives (e.g. running postfix or qmail instead of sendmail). HTH Regards Ansgar Wiechers --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
