On 06/15/11 10:04, Weijun Wang wrote: > Oh, is it possible to use a non-Secure Random?
Since it's just a test: yes. Or even use fixed seed values and avoid (Secure)Random entirely. The test was contributed so I didn't alter it significantly. > > Thanks > Max > > > On 06/15/2011 05:00 PM, Vincent Ryan wrote: >> On 06/15/11 09:45, Weijun Wang wrote: >>> Hi Vinnie >>> >>> Why does this test run in /othervm mode? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Max >> >> It was failing due to SecureRandom problems on some platforms when run in >> samevm >> mode. I think it was related to a lack of entropy.
