On 1/10/2012 11:09 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: > It's late night and I'll read it tomorrow. But can you choose another > word instead of Lengthable? Length is not a verb. > ;-) The name took me a lot of time, searching by google, dictionary, and any possible English translation. I have to agree that I failed to find a suitable name. I tried hardly to persuade myself that "lengthable" is also used by someother application code, so it might not too bad to use it here.
With the word "lengthable", I want to express that the length is measurable. Any suggestion for the better one? Thanks, Xuelei > Max > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 发件人: Xuelei Fan > 发送时间: 2012/1/10 22:51 > 收件人: Weijun Wang > 抄送: OpenJDK > 主题: Re: Code review request, 7106773: 512 bits RSA key cannot work > withSHA384 and SHA512 > > It has been around 50 days passed since the last day we talked about the > issue. Hope you can recall it from the deep memory. ;-) > > webrev: http://javaweb.us.oracle.com/~xufan/bugbios/7106773/webrev.04/ > > In this update, as we agreed, a new Oracle private interface was > introduced: sun.security.util.Lengthable, and Lengthable.length() is > defined to get the length an object. sun.security.pkcs11.P11Key and > sun.security.mscapi.Key will implements the interface. As will easy and > speedup (comparing with reflection approach) the getting of key length > of those unextractable keys in hardware device. > > In the webrev, I should also include another two signed jars, > sunpkcs11.jar and sunmscapi.jar. I will include them when I get the > official signed jars. > > Thanks, > Xuelei > > On 11/22/2011 8:41 AM, Weijun Wang wrote: >> I really like this one. >> >> Thanks >> Max >> >> On 11/21/2011 08:05 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote: >>>> > How about this approach? This looks very safe. >>>> > >>> I also prefer this approach, although it need more updates in PKCS11 and >>> MSCPI source code. If you vote for this approach, I will try to >>> implement it. >>> >
