On 01/10/12 03:19 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote: > On 1/10/2012 11:09 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: >> It's late night and I'll read it tomorrow. But can you choose another >> word instead of Lengthable? Length is not a verb. >> > ;-) The name took me a lot of time, searching by google, dictionary, and > any possible English translation. I have to agree that I failed to find > a suitable name. I tried hardly to persuade myself that "lengthable" is > also used by someother application code, so it might not too bad to use > it here. > > With the word "lengthable", I want to express that the length is > measurable. Any suggestion for the better one? >
Measurable ;-) > Thanks, > Xuelei > >> Max >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> 发件人: Xuelei Fan >> 发送时间: 2012/1/10 22:51 >> 收件人: Weijun Wang >> 抄送: OpenJDK >> 主题: Re: Code review request, 7106773: 512 bits RSA key cannot work >> withSHA384 and SHA512 >> >> It has been around 50 days passed since the last day we talked about the >> issue. Hope you can recall it from the deep memory. ;-) >> >> webrev: http://javaweb.us.oracle.com/~xufan/bugbios/7106773/webrev.04/ >> >> In this update, as we agreed, a new Oracle private interface was >> introduced: sun.security.util.Lengthable, and Lengthable.length() is >> defined to get the length an object. sun.security.pkcs11.P11Key and >> sun.security.mscapi.Key will implements the interface. As will easy and >> speedup (comparing with reflection approach) the getting of key length >> of those unextractable keys in hardware device. >> >> In the webrev, I should also include another two signed jars, >> sunpkcs11.jar and sunmscapi.jar. I will include them when I get the >> official signed jars. >> >> Thanks, >> Xuelei >> >> On 11/22/2011 8:41 AM, Weijun Wang wrote: >>> I really like this one. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Max >>> >>> On 11/21/2011 08:05 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote: >>>>>> How about this approach? This looks very safe. >>>>>> >>>> I also prefer this approach, although it need more updates in PKCS11 and >>>> MSCPI source code. If you vote for this approach, I will try to >>>> implement it. >>>> >> >
