Yes, I find the definition for rounds seems inconsistent in the original
code, so I did a little clean up.
Valerie
On 07/25/12 19:15, Weijun Wang wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/7185471
Looks fine, but I want to confirm if my understanding is correct:
1. I guess ROUNDS being 10, 12 and 14 means keysize of of 128, 192, 256?
2. The original code has confused ROUNDS and key length a little, so
the line
57 /** (ROUNDS-1) * 4 */
was incorrect. You've fixed this and used different names for them.
Thanks
Max
The changes are for JDK 8. May be backported to 7u later if necessary,
Thanks,
Valerie
