On 6/17/2013 5:38 PM, Brad Wetmore wrote:
Pushed. Thanks for the contribution.
P.S. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/116050227ee9
Brad
Brad
On 5/27/2013 12:11 PM, Brad Wetmore wrote:
Hi Deven,
I just got back from a short break, hope to return back to this shortly.
I tweaked your test a bit before I left, but the builds were failing
(unrelated issue) so I couldn't check in. Still need to check the
actual Signature code for a couple things, but I think it's ok.
Brad
On 5/21/2013 2:07 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Brad,
Thanks for your reply, is there any progress on this problem?
I see the last comments on JDK-8014620 is six days before.
Thanks a lot!
On 05/15/2013 08:28 AM, Brad Wetmore wrote:
Offhand, this seems reasonable.
Since you are an OpenJDK author, I've filed:
JDK-8014620: Signature.getAlogrithm return null in special case
and stocked it with your patch.
Thanks,
Brad
On 5/13/2013 9:46 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
I find in a special case: If you create a SignatureSpi service through
extending Signature rather than SignatureSpi, the returned signature
instance will lose its algortithm name.
Though the fix[1] is simple I think it's valuable. Could anyone take
a look?
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei/ojdk-809/webrev/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyoudwei/ojdk-809/webrev/>
Thanks a lot
