On 7/1/2013 8:56 PM, Vincent Ryan wrote: > I think that wrapping a RuntimeException (in CPVE) is acceptable in this case > because the goal is to activate the failover mechanism from OCSP to CRL. > > Do you want RuntimeException to be re-thrown? > No. It is acceptable to me to wrap the RuntimeException. It is not a real runtime exception, but a wrong message. I prefer to use CPVE.
Xuelei > On 29 Jun 2013, at 01:53, Xuelei Fan wrote: > >> Looks fine to me. >> >> Hmm, it is a case to learn that RuntimeException should be token care of >> sometimes. >> >> Thanks, >> Xuelei >> >> On 6/29/2013 2:41 AM, Vincent Ryan wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Please review the following JDK 8 fix: >>> >>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8019259 >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8019259/webrev.00/ >>> >>> It corrects a problem during X.509 certificate revocation checking where >>> failover to using CRLs is not >>> performed in the case when a malformed URL has been supplied as the URL of >>> the OCSP responder. >>> The fix ensures all exceptions during OCSP are caught and wrapped so that >>> the failover mechanism >>> does not get skipped. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >
