OK. Thanks. On 2 Jul 2013, at 00:02, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> On 7/1/2013 8:56 PM, Vincent Ryan wrote: >> I think that wrapping a RuntimeException (in CPVE) is acceptable in this case >> because the goal is to activate the failover mechanism from OCSP to CRL. >> >> Do you want RuntimeException to be re-thrown? >> > No. It is acceptable to me to wrap the RuntimeException. It is not a > real runtime exception, but a wrong message. I prefer to use CPVE. > > Xuelei > >> On 29 Jun 2013, at 01:53, Xuelei Fan wrote: >> >>> Looks fine to me. >>> >>> Hmm, it is a case to learn that RuntimeException should be token care of >>> sometimes. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Xuelei >>> >>> On 6/29/2013 2:41 AM, Vincent Ryan wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Please review the following JDK 8 fix: >>>> >>>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8019259 >>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vinnie/8019259/webrev.00/ >>>> >>>> It corrects a problem during X.509 certificate revocation checking where >>>> failover to using CRLs is not >>>> performed in the case when a malformed URL has been supplied as the URL of >>>> the OCSP responder. >>>> The fix ensures all exceptions during OCSP are caught and wrapped so that >>>> the failover mechanism >>>> does not get skipped. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >> >
