On 08/18/2014 11:59 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:

Interesting changes. It's going to take me some time to look over this
as I have a different projects involving GHASH that would cause a
conflict with the code change layout you have posted.

What kind of changes do you plan? Using intrinsics for the finite field multiplication?

I'd like to work on a follow-up patch to reduce memory allocation during AES-GCM TLS transfers. Even after my GHASH changes, it seems we allocate four bytes for every byte received, which should be easy enough to avoid.

--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security

Reply via email to